Former Indian cricket captain Sunil Gavaskar has expressed strong disapproval of the International Cricket Council’s (ICC) current concussion substitute policy. Gavaskar believes the rule, which allows like-for-like replacements, is being misused. He argues this is particularly evident in instances he perceives as stemming from a lack of skill.
According to the ICC’s guidelines on concussion substitutes, a replacement is permitted under specific conditions if a player suffers a concussion or a suspected concussion during a match.
The controversy gained traction following Rishabh Pant’s toe injury sustained while attempting a reverse sweep against Chris Woakes. Despite the injury, Pant returned to bat on Day 2 and scored a half-century. This demonstrated his commitment and determination.
Gavaskar, in an interview, stated, “I’ve always felt that you are giving a like-for-like substitute for incompetence. If you are not good enough to play short-pitched bowling, don’t play Test cricket; go and play tennis or golf. You are giving a like-for-like substitute for somebody who can’t play the short ball and gets hit.”
Gavaskar further suggested that a specialized committee should be formed to assess injuries, including doctors. He emphasized the need to avoid any perception of bias, especially in situations involving Indian players.