BJP leader Sudhanshu Trivedi dropped a political bombshell, alleging that Jawaharlal Nehru stonewalled the reconstruction of the Somnath Temple despite Sardar Patel’s fervent push. The claim, made during a rally, revives a contentious chapter from India’s early post-independence history.
Destroyed repeatedly by foreign invaders, Somnath stood as a beacon of Hindu heritage. After 1947, Patel saw its rebuilding as essential for national morale and communal harmony. He rallied support from donors and leaders alike, but faced resistance from Nehru, who feared it smacked of majoritarianism.
‘Nehru categorically denied permission for Somnath’s reconstruction,’ Trivedi declared, citing Patel’s letters and cabinet minutes. This internal Congress rift highlights contrasting visions: Patel’s inclusive nationalism embracing cultural roots, versus Nehru’s vision of a religion-neutral state.
Despite Nehru’s opposition, Patel forged ahead, securing private funds and laying the foundation in 1947. The temple reopened in 1951 amid national celebrations, with Patel passing away months later. Nehru’s presence at the event was perfunctory, fueling speculation of lingering discord.
Trivedi’s remarks come amid BJP’s efforts to elevate Patel’s stature through campaigns like Statue of Unity. They portray Nehru as out of touch with India’s spiritual ethos, a narrative gaining traction in polarized politics. Opposition voices dismiss it as revisionism, urging context on Nehru’s broader secular contributions.
Archival evidence supports elements of the claim—Nehru expressed reservations in writings, prioritizing development over religious projects. Yet, the temple’s success marked a rare Congress-led cultural revival.
Today, Somnath thrives as a pilgrimage hub, drawing millions. Trivedi’s intervention ensures the story endures, prompting reflection on how leaders balanced faith, state, and identity in nascent India. It’s a reminder that history is rarely black-and-white.