Peace negotiations between Pakistan and Afghanistan, hosted by Turkey in Istanbul, have concluded without any positive outcomes. This failure jeopardizes the existing fragile ceasefire, with both nations pointing fingers at each other for the diplomatic stalemate. Adding to the tension, the Taliban has issued a stern warning to Islamabad, vowing a strong retaliatory response to any future incursions along the Durand Line.
During the talks, Pakistan made a surprising admission regarding its defense policy. According to Afghan media, Pakistan acknowledged a prior agreement with an unspecified foreign nation that permits drone strikes on its territory. This pact, Pakistan stated, cannot be unilaterally broken, preventing them from blocking such operations. This revelation comes at a time of evolving geopolitical alliances for Pakistan, including a recent Strategic Mutual Defence Agreement with Saudi Arabia and ongoing cooperation with the United States.
Furthermore, Pakistan’s delegation strongly advocated for Kabul to acknowledge its ‘right to respond’ to attacks orchestrated by the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). However, the Taliban maintains that the TTP issue is an internal Pakistani concern. They reaffirmed their commitment to preventing Afghan soil from being used to threaten other countries.
Adding to the escalating rhetoric, the Taliban reiterated its resolve to retaliate against any Pakistani military actions. Reports quoted Taliban representatives declaring that bombing Afghan territory would result in direct targeting of Islamabad. This warning echoes recent statements by Pakistan’s Defence Minister, who indicated the possibility of ‘open war’ if peace agreements failed, while also noting the Taliban’s stated desire for peace.
Sources confirm the talks have reached an impasse, with both sides engaged in mutual accusations. Pakistani officials reportedly expressed frustration over Kabul’s rejection of their ‘logical and legitimate demands’ concerning national security. Conversely, the Taliban delegation characterized the Pakistani representatives as ‘unwilling’ and ‘disorganized,’ citing instances of their representatives repeatedly withdrawing from the negotiating table, indicating a lack of coordination.